Tiger vs Linked Helper 2025: Cloud vs Desktop LinkedIn Automation Compared
By Adhiraj HangalWhen choosing LinkedIn automation, you face a fundamental decision: cloud-based platforms like Tiger that prioritize simplicity and safety, or desktop applications like Linked Helper that offer extensive control and lower pricing. Both automate LinkedIn outreach effectively, but they serve different users with fundamentally different philosophies.
This comparison breaks down how Tiger and Linked Helper differ across architecture, features, pricing, and ideal use cases. By the end, you'll know which platform aligns with your needs—whether you prioritize ease of use and built-in safety, or maximum control and minimal cost.
What Is Tiger?
Tiger is a cloud-based LinkedIn automation platform designed for sales professionals and recruiters who want simple, safe outreach without technical complexity. You can launch your first campaign in 5 minutes, and built-in safety features protect your account automatically.
Because everything runs in the cloud, campaigns continue 24/7 without requiring your computer to stay on. There's no software to install, no updates to manage manually, and no impact on your device's performance. Tiger focuses exclusively on LinkedIn, delivering specialized features optimized for prospecting on the platform that matters most for B2B sales.
Key features:
- Cloud-based architecture—campaigns run 24/7 automatically
- 5-minute setup from signup to active campaign
- Built-in safety: automatic warm-ups, randomization, enforced limits
- Unlimited campaigns and messages at $39/month
- AI-powered features (currently in beta)
- CRM integration via Zapier, API, and webhooks
- Team management features coming soon
What Is Linked Helper?
Linked Helper is a desktop-based LinkedIn automation platform that launched in 2014. It provides extensive control over complex, multi-step campaigns and includes an integrated CRM, InMail automation, and a built-in email finder with monthly credits.
As a Windows/Mac/Linux desktop application, Linked Helper requires local installation and runs campaigns directly from your computer rather than in the cloud. This architectural choice gives users complete control over their automation environment but comes with significant trade-offs.
Linked Helper excels at advanced personalization with custom variables and image templates, giving power users the flexibility to build highly customized outreach sequences. It's a widely used platform with over 300,000 users across 180+ countries and maintains a 4.6/5 rating on G2 from 145 reviews.
Key features:
- Desktop application for Windows, Mac, and Linux
- Integrated CRM with tagging and notes
- Advanced personalization with custom variables
- InMail automation for paid LinkedIn profiles
- Built-in email finder with monthly credits
- Extremely affordable ($15-45/month, $8.25-24.75 annually)
- Extensive customization for power users
Cloud vs Desktop: What's the Difference?
The most significant difference between Tiger and Linked Helper isn't features or pricing—it's architectural philosophy. This distinction affects everything from daily usability to reliability and accessibility.
Tiger (Cloud-Based)
- Always running: Campaigns execute 24/7 without your computer
- Zero device impact: No processing power or performance drain
- Access anywhere: Manage campaigns from any device with internet
- Automatic updates: No manual installations or maintenance
- Instant setup: No software to download or configure
Linked Helper (Desktop-Based)
- Computer required: Must stay on for campaigns to run
- Resource consumption: Uses local processing power
- Campaigns pause: Stop when you shut down your device
- Manual updates: You handle software maintenance
- Setup complexity: Installation and configuration required
For individual users with a single LinkedIn account and consistent computer availability, the desktop approach works fine. But for professionals who travel, work remotely, or simply don't want to dedicate a computer to automation, cloud infrastructure becomes essential.
Campaign Automation Capabilities
Tiger's Campaign Features
Tiger focuses on simplicity without sacrificing effectiveness:
- Multi-step sequences with connection requests and follow-up messages
- Smart reply detection—sequences stop when prospects respond
- Auto-withdrawal of pending invites after 30 days
- Import from Sales Navigator, Recruiter, CSV, or API
- AI-powered lead filtering and message personalization (beta)
- Unlimited concurrent campaigns—no artificial caps
- Campaigns run continuously in the cloud
- Smart scheduling with human-like activity patterns
Tiger enforces LinkedIn's safe limits automatically (approximately 100 connection requests per week, staying well within platform guidelines). The platform handles timing and safety, so you focus on messaging and targeting.
Linked Helper's Campaign Features
Linked Helper provides deep customization for power users:
- Fully customizable multi-step sequences
- InMail automation for paid or open profiles
- Group member and event attendee targeting
- Conditional logic for complex workflow chains
- Advanced variable system for extensive personalization
- Image and video customization with merge fields
- Built-in CRM for contact management
Note: The Standard plan caps certain actions at 20 group/event invites and 20 bulk likes daily. The Pro plan removes these restrictions for unlimited automation. Setup complexity is higher but gives experienced users maximum control.
Team Management & Multi-Account Support
Tiger's Team Approach
Team management and multi-account features are currently in development and coming soon. For now, Tiger is optimized for individual users. Each team member can use Tiger on their own account at $39/month.
Once team features launch, you'll be able to manage multiple accounts from one dashboard with shared inboxes and role-based permissions—all native features built into the cloud infrastructure.
Linked Helper's Multi-Account Approach
Linked Helper supports multiple accounts, but requires manual configuration:
- Install multiple software versions on one PC
- Or use rental servers to run different accounts
- "Organization" feature pools licenses for teams
- No unified inbox—each account remains separate
- Team members switch between different Linked Helper instances
Multi-account management is technically possible and many power users run it successfully, but it demands setup time, technical knowledge, and ongoing infrastructure maintenance.
Verdict: Currently, Linked Helper has the advantage for teams needing multi-account support today. Once Tiger's team features launch, the cloud-based simplicity will make it more competitive for team environments.
Safety & Compliance
Tiger's Safety Philosophy
Tiger builds safety into the core platform rather than requiring manual configuration:
- Automatic warm-up schedules for new accounts
- Randomized timing between all actions
- Enforced daily limits that keep you safe by default
- Real-time monitoring of LinkedIn detection patterns
- Auto-adjustment if warning signs detected
- No browser plugins that LinkedIn monitors for automation
Running remotely in the cloud rather than through browser extensions inherently reduces detection risks. Thousands of users run Tiger daily without restrictions because the platform mimics human behavior at every level.
Linked Helper's Safety Features
Linked Helper emphasizes account protection but gives users manual control:
- Desktop application avoids browser extension detection
- Proxy support (HTTP and SOCKS) per account
- Multiple sender accounts to spread activity
- Granular rate-limit settings for user control
- Warm-up sequences for new accounts
- Human-like behavior with random timeouts and scrolling
Linked Helper has effective safety measures with a strong track record. The difference is philosophy: Tiger automates safety by default ("trust us to handle it"), while Linked Helper gives technically savvy users controls to implement their own protection strategies.
Verdict: Tiger wins on safety for non-technical users who want protection without configuration. Linked Helper appeals to power users who prefer manual control over safety parameters.
Integrations & API Access
Tiger's Integrations
Tiger focuses on connecting to existing sales tech stacks:
- Public API for custom integrations
- Webhook support for real-time data sync
- Zapier compatibility (thousands of pre-built integrations)
- CRM connections: HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, etc.
- Slack and email notifications
- CSV import/export for data portability
Tiger's integration strategy recognizes that most teams already have established systems and want LinkedIn automation to enhance rather than replace existing infrastructure.
Linked Helper's Integrations
Linked Helper includes extensive built-in integrations:
- Native CRM with tagging, notes, and enrichment
- Direct integrations: HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Zoho, ActiveCampaign
- Webhook support for custom connections
- Zapier and Make compatibility
- Built-in email finder with monthly credits
Linked Helper supports more out-of-the-box connectors, particularly for CRM systems. Tiger covers essentials through API and Zapier with a lighter-weight approach.
Verdict: Linked Helper offers more native integrations. Tiger provides flexible API/webhook access that covers most use cases through middleware.
AI & Personalization Features
Tiger's AI Capabilities
Tiger's AI features (currently in beta) reduce manual work while improving results:
- AI lead filtering based on natural language criteria
- Smart message personalization using prospect data
- Custom merge fields (name, company, job title, etc.)
- Reply suggestions to boost response rates
- Image and video support for visual personalization
The focus is making AI assistance accessible to non-technical users who want better results without learning complex syntax or template systems.
Linked Helper's Personalization
Linked Helper focuses on template-based customization for maximum control:
- Advanced variable system with extensive custom fields
- Image personalization with custom variables
- Hyper-personalization templates (can double/triple response rates)
- Manual configuration for precise control
- Rule-based systems vs AI recommendations
This approach requires more setup time but provides exact control over personalization for experienced users who know what they want to implement.
Verdict: Tiger's AI approach (beta) appeals to users wanting intelligent suggestions. Linked Helper's template system suits power users preferring deterministic, rule-based control.
Ease of Use & Setup Time
Tiger's User Experience
Tiger prioritizes accessibility for non-technical users:
- 5-minute setup: Signup to active campaign
- No installation: Cloud-based, browser access
- Intuitive interface: Modern, minimal design
- Pre-configured safety: Works well out of the box
- No technical expertise: Required for any features
- Immediate value: Results without configuration
This approach sacrifices some advanced configuration options in favor of reducing friction for users who want results quickly.
Linked Helper's Learning Curve
Linked Helper requires more initial investment:
- Desktop software installation (Windows/Mac/Linux)
- Manual LinkedIn login configuration per account
- Steeper learning curve due to extensive features
- Complexity increases setup time significantly
- Best for technically proficient users
Power users appreciate the depth once they master the platform. The desktop architecture and complex interface create barriers for non-technical users but provide flexibility that automation experts value.
Verdict: Tiger wins decisively on ease of use and setup speed. Linked Helper appeals to technical users who can invest time learning in exchange for maximum control.
Customer Support
Both platforms offer strong customer support with different approaches:
Tiger Support
Responsive team accessible via live chat and email. Quick turnaround on technical questions with straightforward documentation. The focus is solving issues quickly through direct communication channels.
Linked Helper Support
24/7 email support with extensive knowledge base. Trustpilot reviews consistently praise "fantastic" support teams. Active user community provides peer assistance for common questions and advanced configurations.
Verdict: Both maintain strong support reputations. Main difference is channel preference (live chat vs email) and documentation depth (streamlined vs comprehensive).
Pricing Comparison
Pricing differs significantly between Tiger and Linked Helper, reflecting their different target audiences, infrastructure costs, and feature philosophies.
Tiger Pricing
- Single plan: $39/month per user
- Included: Unlimited campaigns, unlimited messages, all features
- AI capabilities: In beta, included at no extra cost
- Infrastructure: Cloud hosting included
- Free trial: 14 days, no credit card required
Linked Helper Pricing
- Standard: $15/month ($8.25/month annually)
- Standard limits: 20 group/event invites daily, 20 bulk likes daily
- Pro: $45/month ($24.75/month annually)
- Pro features: Unlimited actions, all features unlocked
- Prepayment discounts: 11% (3 months), 33% (6 months), 45% (12 months)
- Free trial: 14 days
Pricing Analysis by Use Case
| Use Case | Tiger Cost | Linked Helper Cost | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Account (Individual) | $39/month | $8.25/month (Pro annual) | Linked Helper (79% cheaper) |
| Cloud Access Required | $39/month (included) | $24.75 + server costs | Tiger (native cloud) |
| Non-Technical User | $39/month (5-min setup) | $24.75 + learning time | Tiger (ease of use) |
| Budget-Conscious Power User | $39/month | $8.25-24.75/month | Linked Helper (lowest cost) |
The real pricing comparison depends on your priorities:
- Lowest absolute cost: Linked Helper wins (Standard at $8.25/month annually)
- Best value for cloud access: Tiger wins (no infrastructure needed)
- Fastest ROI: Tiger wins (5-minute setup vs hours of configuration)
- Maximum control on budget: Linked Helper wins (Pro at $24.75/month annually)
Tiger vs Linked Helper: Which Tool Should You Choose?
Choose Tiger If...
- You want campaigns running 24/7 without dedicating a computer
- You prioritize simplicity and 5-minute setup over extensive configuration
- Account safety by default is more important than manual control
- You work remotely or travel frequently
- You're non-technical and want intuitive, modern UX
- You value unlimited campaigns without action caps
- You're willing to pay more for cloud convenience and safety
Tiger makes sense for professionals who view automation as a tool that should "just work" rather than a system requiring ongoing management. The $39/month price includes cloud infrastructure, automatic safety, and immediate value without technical investment.
Choose Linked Helper If...
- You're technically proficient and comfortable with desktop software
- You have a computer running consistently (or rental server access)
- Budget is tight and $8.25-24.75/month fits better than $39/month
- You want maximum control over every automation parameter
- You need multi-account support today (Tiger's coming soon)
- You prefer rule-based systems over AI recommendations
- You can invest time in setup and configuration
Linked Helper makes sense for power users with existing infrastructure or dedicated computers who can invest setup time in exchange for significant cost savings and extensive customization.
Final Verdict
Both Tiger and Linked Helper are effective LinkedIn automation platforms with strong track records. The choice comes down to your priorities and technical comfort level.
Tiger wins for:
- Ease of use and fastest setup (5 minutes)
- Built-in safety without manual configuration
- Cloud accessibility from any device
- Non-technical users wanting simplicity
- Professionals who value time over cost savings
Linked Helper wins for:
- Lowest absolute cost ($8.25-24.75/month annually)
- Maximum customization and control
- Multi-account support today (vs Tiger's coming soon)
- Power users comfortable with technical complexity
- Users with existing desktop infrastructure
For most LinkedIn professionals—especially those who travel, work remotely, or simply want automation that works without technical overhead—Tiger's cloud-based simplicity and built-in safety justify the higher price point.
For technically skilled individual users with budget constraints and consistent computer availability, Linked Helper's comprehensive features and low pricing make it an excellent value.
Try both platforms with their 14-day free trials to experience the architectural differences firsthand and determine which workflow aligns better with your needs.